Home / Arts and Entertainment / Café Tacvba vs. Spotify: Music's Moral Stand
Café Tacvba vs. Spotify: Music's Moral Stand
15 Jan
Summary
- Café Tacvba requested their catalog be removed from Spotify due to ethical concerns.
- The band cited Spotify's investments in weaponry and AI as reasons for their stance.
- Spotify responded, denying financing war and defending their AI policies.

Mexican rock quartet Café Tacvba has formally requested that their entire music catalog be removed from Spotify. This unprecedented move in the Latin American music scene stems from ethical objections to the streaming giant's business practices, including alleged investments in defense technology and propaganda, as well as concerns over artificial intelligence and royalty distribution.
Rubén Albarrán, the band's vocalist, explained that while their music has generated significant revenue on the platform, the royalties received are far from millions, and the company's actions are morally reprehensible. He emphasized that this is not a confrontation with their record labels but with Spotify itself, as the labels are responsible for contracting with digital platforms.
Spotify has countered, stating they do not finance war and that their AI policies are designed to protect human artists. The company also highlighted the substantial earnings generated by Café Tacvba's music. Despite Spotify's defense, Café Tacvba is proceeding with their request, encouraging both artists and users to raise their voices and demand ethical practices within the music industry.




