Home / Arts and Entertainment / AI: Cinema's New Muse or Human's End?
AI: Cinema's New Muse or Human's End?
23 Dec
Summary
- AI accelerates filmmaking but cannot replace human artistic touch.
- Filmmakers debate AI's ethical use and its impact on creativity.
- AI enhances production but human emotion remains cinema's soul.

The film industry is experiencing a rapid influx of Artificial Intelligence, prompting a critical re-evaluation of production processes and artistic integrity. Filmmakers are debating AI's scope, particularly concerning its potential to replace human creativity and the preservation of cinema's inherent human essence in an increasingly automated landscape.
Industry leaders offer varied perspectives. Ashwin Kumar views AI as a creative accelerator for content creation, especially in animation, while cautioning against purely prompt-based applications. Conversely, Ishan Shukla stresses AI's limitations in capturing human emotion and complex narratives, suggesting its current utility lies in non-human characters or worlds. James Cameron acknowledges AI's inevitability, advocating for its constructive and ethical integration, particularly in pre-visualization and editing.
Shekhar Kapur highlights the irreplaceable collaborative energy between human artists and directors, pointing out that AI currently struggles to replicate the nuanced emotional depth conveyed by actors like Cate Blanchett or Shabana Azmi, especially in close-ups. Ultimately, the consensus suggests AI will transform filmmaking by enhancing efficiency and opening new avenues for creators, but the core of storytelling—human performance, emotion, and lived experience—will remain the driving force, ensuring cinema evolves creatively.




