What are Meta's internal documents saying about teen addiction?

Internal Meta documents reportedly describe Instagram as a "drug" and its creators as "pushers," indicating awareness of its addictive nature among teens.

How do school districts claim social media affects youth mental health?

School districts allege that deliberately addictive design features on platforms like TikTok and Snapchat contribute to a youth mental health crisis that schools must manage.

Are social media companies aware of the addictive nature of their platforms?

Yes, internal documents cited in a lawsuit suggest that companies like TikTok, Meta, and Snapchat were aware their platforms could be addictive and harm minors.

Home / Technology / Social Media Giants Accused of 'Drug Pusher' Tactics on Teens

Social Media Giants Accused of 'Drug Pusher' Tactics on Teens

26 Nov, 2025

•

Summary

Internal documents reveal companies knew platforms were addictive to teens.
Lawsuit alleges deliberate design features maximize youth engagement for profit.
School districts claim social media fuels a youth mental health crisis.

Social Media Giants Accused of 'Drug Pusher' Tactics on Teens

Hundreds of school districts and individuals across the United States have filed a lawsuit against social media companies, including Meta, TikTok, and Snap. Recently unsealed legal filings quote internal company documents and employee testimony alleging that these platforms were deliberately designed to maximize youth engagement, driving advertising revenue.

Internal research and communications reportedly reveal that Meta researchers described Instagram as a "drug" and "pushers," while TikTok noted minors lack the "executive mental function to control their screen time." Snapchat executives allegedly acknowledged their platform "dominates" addicted users' lives.

The lawsuit asserts that these platforms have contributed to a growing youth mental health crisis, placing a burden on schools to provide counseling and resources. The tech companies are seeking to dismiss the case, with spokespeople stating the allegations paint a misleading picture and that they have implemented safety features.