Home / Technology / Internet Cut Off? Piracy Case Heads to SCOTUS

Internet Cut Off? Piracy Case Heads to SCOTUS

Summary

  • Supreme Court will hear Cox's appeal on ISP liability for piracy.
  • Music industry wants ISPs to cut internet for alleged downloaders.
  • Cox argues this could unfairly disconnect homes and businesses.
Internet Cut Off? Piracy Case Heads to SCOTUS

A pivotal case concerning internet access and digital piracy is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. The legal battle centers on whether telecommunications companies, such as Cox Communications, can be held responsible for copyright infringement occurring on their networks. This follows a lower court's decision to overturn a $1 billion damages award against Cox, prompting the company's appeal.

Record labels are urging the court to find Cox liable for failing to prevent piracy, advocating for the disconnection of internet services to IP addresses identified with illegal music downloads. Cox, however, contends that such a policy is an extreme overreach, potentially resulting in unwarranted internet service disruptions for individuals and entities.

This case has far-reaching implications for internet users nationwide. Cox has garnered support from organizations like the Department of Justice and the ACLU, suggesting a complex legal landscape. The Supreme Court's forthcoming ruling could significantly shape how online activity is policed and what responsibilities internet providers bear.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
The Supreme Court is reviewing Cox's appeal regarding its liability for music piracy that occurs on its internet network.
The music industry wants ISPs like Cox to cut internet access for piracy, but this is being challenged in the Supreme Court.
Cox could be held liable for piracy, and ISPs might be required to disconnect internet service for users accused of illegal downloads.

Read more news on