feedzop-word-mark-logo
searchLogin
Feedzop
homeFor YouIndiaIndia
You
bookmarksYour BookmarkshashtagYour Topics
Trending
trending

Gold prices reach record highs

trending

Juventus takeover bid rejected

trending

Mbappé scores, Madrid beats Alaves

trending

Dhurandhar beats Hindi film records

trending

Bangalore cold wave continues

trending

Railways plans for pay commission

trending

India vs South Africa live

trending

Heavy rain alert issued

trending

Snapchat woos Indian advertisers

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyAboutJobsPartner With Us

© 2025 Advergame Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ("ATPL"). Gamezop ® & Quizzop ® are registered trademarks of ATPL.

Gamezop is a plug-and-play gaming platform that any app or website can integrate to bring casual gaming for its users. Gamezop also operates Quizzop, a quizzing platform, that digital products can add as a trivia section.

Over 5,000 products from more than 70 countries have integrated Gamezop and Quizzop. These include Amazon, Samsung Internet, Snap, Tata Play, AccuWeather, Paytm, Gulf News, and Branch.

Games and trivia increase user engagement significantly within all kinds of apps and websites, besides opening a new stream of advertising revenue. Gamezop and Quizzop take 30 minutes to integrate and can be used for free: both by the products integrating them and end users

Increase ad revenue and engagement on your app / website with games, quizzes, astrology, and cricket content. Visit: business.gamezop.com

Property Code: 5571

Home / Technology / Who is a Journalist? Court Ruling Challenges New Media

Who is a Journalist? Court Ruling Challenges New Media

14 Dec

•

Summary

  • A Florida judge ruled a YouTube creator isn't a journalist.
  • Lively's team sought personal info from content creators.
  • The ruling may impact independent digital journalists.
Who is a Journalist? Court Ruling Challenges New Media

A Florida judge recently ruled that a YouTube content creator, known for their "Popcorned Planet" channel, does not qualify for journalist privilege. This decision stems from a legal battle initiated by Blake Lively's team, who sought personal details from numerous online creators, accusing them of orchestrating a smear campaign.

The ruling has raised concerns about the legal protections afforded to independent digital journalists. The judge cited the creator's self-employed status and publishing platform as reasons for disqualification, suggesting traditional media affiliations are crucial for such privileges.

This case highlights the evolving definition of journalism in the digital era, where lines between content creators and traditional media are increasingly blurred. The outcome could significantly impact how independent reporters gather and disseminate information online.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
A recent Florida ruling suggests that a YouTube creator may not automatically qualify for reporter's privilege, depending on their platform and affiliation.
Blake Lively's attorneys subpoenaed personal information from online content creators, alleging they were part of a coordinated negative campaign.
The definition of a journalist is currently being debated in courts, with traditional media affiliations sometimes favored over independent online platforms.

Read more news on

Technologyside-arrowBlake Livelyside-arrow

You may also like

Disney+ Ditches 'Holes' TV Adaptation

13 Dec • 21 reads

article image

Goggins' Double Role Shock on Fallout Set

3 Dec • 60 reads

article image

Reynolds & Lively's Group Effort Hits Milestone

1 Dec • 66 reads

article image

Blake Lively's Date Night Glam & Gossip Girl Nod

27 Nov • 83 reads

article image

Gossip Girl Mom & Star Reunite on NYC Street!

19 Nov • 113 reads

article image