Is the new Apple Vision Pro hardware significantly better?

The new Vision Pro hardware offers improved comfort with a new headband and slightly better battery life, alongside performance gains from the M5 chip, but these are not considered transformational.

What are the main problems with the Apple Vision Pro platform?

The primary issues are a scarcity of engaging content and limited third-party developer support, which have prevented the device from becoming a daily-use product despite its advanced hardware.

Will Apple continue to develop the Vision Pro line?

While the M5 Vision Pro is the first of four planned releases, reports suggest Apple may be redirecting resources to smart glasses, casting doubt on the future of the Vision Pro line as a primary focus.

Home / Technology / Apple Vision Pro: Brilliant But Hanging On

Apple Vision Pro: Brilliant But Hanging On

26 Nov

•

Summary

Vision Pro hardware improved, but software and content lag.
New headset offers comfort and modest battery life gains.
Mac virtual monitor feature is a standout, but sales remain slow.

Apple Vision Pro: Brilliant But Hanging On

Despite hardware advancements in the latest Apple Vision Pro, the spatial computing platform is "hanging on by a thread." While the new model offers a more comfortable headband and a modest increase in battery life, these improvements are overshadowed by a persistent lack of compelling content and developer engagement.

The device's appeal is further diminished by its high $3,500 price point and the company's apparent pivot towards future smart glasses. Key features like Personas for communication are improved but remain novelties rather than essential tools, and the EyeSight feature is seen as a costly, weight-adding distraction.

However, the Vision Pro shines as a virtual Mac monitor, offering expanded display options and improved refresh rates, making it a valuable travel companion for some. This functionality, alongside spatial video playback, represents the headset's strongest current use cases, suggesting Apple should "kill its darlings" and focus on what works.