feedzop-word-mark-logo
searchLogin
Feedzop
homeFor YouIndiaIndia
You
bookmarksYour BookmarkshashtagYour Topics
Trending
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyAboutJobsPartner With Us

© 2026 Advergame Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ("ATPL"). Gamezop ® & Quizzop ® are registered trademarks of ATPL.

Gamezop is a plug-and-play gaming platform that any app or website can integrate to bring casual gaming for its users. Gamezop also operates Quizzop, a quizzing platform, that digital products can add as a trivia section.

Over 5,000 products from more than 70 countries have integrated Gamezop and Quizzop. These include Amazon, Samsung Internet, Snap, Tata Play, AccuWeather, Paytm, Gulf News, and Branch.

Games and trivia increase user engagement significantly within all kinds of apps and websites, besides opening a new stream of advertising revenue. Gamezop and Quizzop take 30 minutes to integrate and can be used for free: both by the products integrating them and end users

Increase ad revenue and engagement on your app / website with games, quizzes, astrology, and cricket content. Visit: business.gamezop.com

Property Code: 5571

Home / Technology / AI Code: Trusted by Few, Used by Many?

AI Code: Trusted by Few, Used by Many?

13 Jan

•

Summary

  • 96% of developers doubt AI-generated code's correctness.
  • AI code usage grew from 6% to 42% in one year.
  • Developers often use personal accounts for AI tools.
AI Code: Trusted by Few, Used by Many?

A significant portion of developers express low confidence in AI-generated code, with 96% stating they don't fully trust its functional correctness. Despite this skepticism, the use of AI in coding has dramatically increased, rising from 6% in 2023 to an estimated 42% of developers' code. This trend is projected to climb to 65% by 2027, indicating a rapid integration of AI tools into development workflows.

The verification process for AI-generated code remains a critical concern. While 59% of developers spend moderate to substantial effort checking AI's output, 38% find it takes longer than reviewing human-written code. This caution is warranted, as research suggests AI tools produce 1.7 times more issues, including major ones, compared to human developers. The common observation is that AI code often appears correct but is not.

Beyond functional correctness, security and data exposure are paramount worries. Over one-third of developers use personal accounts for AI tools, a figure higher for specific assistants like ChatGPT (52%) and Perplexity (63%). This practice introduces risks of exposing confidential company information. Consequently, data exposure and vulnerabilities rank among the top concerns for developers, underscoring the need for robust verification and secure usage protocols.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Developers doubt AI code's functional correctness and find it can take longer to verify than human-written code.
Key risks include introducing bugs, vulnerabilities, and potential exposure of sensitive company data through personal account usage.
AI code usage has surged dramatically, from 6% in 2023 to 42% currently, and is expected to reach 65% by 2027.

Read more news on

Technologyside-arrowArtificial Intelligence (AI)side-arrow
trending

India U19 World Cup final

trending

India, Afghanistan U19 semifinal

trending

India vs South Africa warm-up

trending

Anthropic AI triggers IT selloff

trending

Pakistan vs Ireland warm-up

trending

T20 World Cup 2026 details

trending

Afghanistan vs West Indies match

trending

McMullen unsold for IPL 2026

trending

Axar Patel cricket career

You may also like

AI Browsers: Your New Internet Navigator

19 hours ago • 49 reads

article image

AI Swarms Invade Social Media With Fake News

31 Jan • 27 reads

article image

AI for Cops: Perplexity Offers Free Tech

21 Jan • 79 reads

article image

AI-First Browsing: ChatGPT Replaces Google Search

20 Jan • 99 reads

article image

Physical AI: The Next Revolution After ChatGPT?

13 Jan • 144 reads

article image