Home / Sports / MVP Debate: Stafford vs. Maye - Schedule Myth?
MVP Debate: Stafford vs. Maye - Schedule Myth?
10 Jan
Summary
- ESPN analyst disputes schedule strength as MVP factor.
- Maye outperformed Stafford in common games by key metrics.
- Article questions discounting Stafford's travel and TD proximity.
The MVP race between Los Angeles Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford and New England Patriots quarterback Drake Maye is intensifying as the NFL regular season concludes. A recent analysis by ESPN's Dan Graziano argues that Maye has been the premier quarterback, dismissing the idea that Stafford should win due to a softer schedule. Graziano highlights Maye's league-leading QBR, adjusted for opponent quality, and his superior performance in games against common opponents.
However, this perspective is countered by a closer examination of the data. The analysis points out that Maye's schedule did not involve West Coast travel or significant time zone changes, unlike Stafford's. Furthermore, it questions the dismissal of Stafford's success with short-yardage touchdowns, arguing these require considerable skill. The article also notes the difference in defensive strengths faced by both quarterbacks.
Ultimately, the piece suggests that while both players are deserving, the MVP narrative should not be solely based on a limited six-game sample or by unfairly penalizing Stafford for his circumstances. It advocates for a holistic view, considering all aspects of each player's season rather than cherry-picking statistics to fit a predetermined conclusion.
