Why did the Saints defensive star comment on Josh Allen's playoff chances?

The Saints defensive star explained his comments were part of a debate on 'First Take' where he used a process of elimination to discuss potential Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks.

What is the player's reasoning for Super Bowl rings being important for quarterbacks?

The player stated that Super Bowl rings are often the primary measuring stick for quarterbacks, influencing how their careers are discussed and evaluated.

Does the Saints player have a personal issue with Josh Allen?

No, the Saints player clarified there is no personal feud with Josh Allen and that his remarks were made within the context of a sports debate.

Home / Sports / Saints Star Clarifies Allen Playoff Jab

Saints Star Clarifies Allen Playoff Jab

7 Feb

•

Summary

Defensive star explained his comments were part of a debate.
He used a process of elimination for quarterback Super Bowl prospects.
Jordan emphasized Super Bowl rings as a quarterback's key metric.

A well-known Saints defensive player recently clarified his controversial remarks about Josh Allen's playoff prospects. He explained that his statements, which drew criticism, stemmed from a debate segment on 'First Take' where he was asked to identify the next quarterback likely to win a Super Bowl. Jordan stated he used a process of elimination, considering Joe Burrow and Josh Allen's existing playoff experience and potential.

He further elaborated that Super Bowl victories frequently serve as the ultimate benchmark for quarterback evaluations, citing Drew Brees' career as an example where his championship was a focal point. The player stressed that his commentary on Allen was not intended as a definitive knock on his career, highlighting the rapid shifts in NFL narratives. He suggested that if Lamar Jackson does not secure a Super Bowl, he might face similar scrutiny as Allen currently does.

The defensive star also humorously addressed the backlash, even joking about needing to appease the Bills Mafia. He asserted that there is no personal animosity towards Josh Allen, emphasizing that his comments were purely an analytical exercise within a sports debate context.