What officiating error did the RFEF admit?

The RFEF admitted that a foul, involving a studs-first contact on a Barcelona defender before a goal, was incorrectly not penalized.

What part of the refereeing laws was cited for the infraction?

The CTA cited 'Law 12: Fouls and Misconduct,' which clarifies that a reckless stamp constitutes a foul and a caution, and excessive force must be sanctioned.

Home / Sports / RFEF Admits Officiating Mistake, Barcelona Responds

RFEF Admits Officiating Mistake, Barcelona Responds

Q: How did Barcelona react to the RFEF's admission?

Barcelona responded on social media, stating that 'Owning a mistake is a big step. Avoiding it is the next,' implying criticism of officiating standards.

25 Feb

•

Summary

RFEF and CTA admitted a refereeing error occurred during a key match.
Barcelona subtly criticized officiating standards in Spain after the admission.
The infraction involved a studs-first foul by a Girona player before a goal.

RFEF Admits Officiating Mistake, Barcelona Responds

In a rare display of transparency, the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) and its Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) released a joint statement admitting to an officiating mistake. The incident occurred during a critical match, involving a foul by a Girona forward on a Barcelona defender just before a goal was scored. The CTA's detailed analysis confirmed that the forward's studs-first contact constituted a foul and warranted a yellow card.

According to the RFEF's assessment, the referee and VAR should have intervened to correct the on-pitch decision. The committee cited Law 12 of the game, emphasizing that reckless stamps and excessive force must be sanctioned, irrespective of contesting the ball. This admission came under scrutiny from Barcelona, who responded via social media with a sharp remark.

The Catalan club posted, "Owning a mistake is a big step. Avoiding it is the next," subtly criticizing the officiating standards within Spain's top league. The RFEF's clarification noted that the VAR review should have identified the clear and obvious error, advising the referee to disallow the goal and issue a caution.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.