Home / Sports / NFL Ref Confusion: Sack or Incomplete Pass?
NFL Ref Confusion: Sack or Incomplete Pass?
14 Sep
Summary
- Controversial call shifted momentum in Lions' overtime win.
- Officials initially ruled it a strip-sack touchdown, then reversed.
- NFL rulebook cited regarding passer's throwing motion.
In a dramatic 31-30 overtime victory for the Detroit Lions against the New Orleans Saints, a contentious officiating decision early in the second quarter sowed confusion. The play in question involved a sack of Lions quarterback Jared Goff, which Saints defender Chase Young initially seemed to have forced a fumble on, resulting in a defensive touchdown. However, officials reviewed the play and reversed the call, deeming it an incomplete forward pass.
This reversal, attributed to the NFL's rulebook concerning a passer's throwing motion, became a focal point of post-game discussions. NFL Vice President of Instant Replay Mark Butterworth explained that because Goff had already begun his throwing motion when contacted, the subsequent backward movement of the ball was still considered part of a forward pass. While Saints players felt it looked like a sack-fumble, they acknowledged the rule's technicality, with coach Kellen Moore noting protection is afforded once the arm is moving.
Despite the debate, Lions coach Dan Campbell accepted the call, acknowledging the forward motion of Goff's arm. The Saints, though feeling the call was tough, also pointed to their offense's inability to seal the win. The unique circumstances surrounding the play left both sides questioning the interpretation but ultimately favored the Lions in their narrow victory.