Home / Sports / NBA Draft Elimination: The Worst Idea Yet?
NBA Draft Elimination: The Worst Idea Yet?
16 Feb
Summary
- Commissioner seeks to stop tanking by potentially eliminating the NBA draft.
- New CBA limits free agency, pushing teams towards draft for superteams.
- Eliminating the draft could harm small markets and destroy parity.

The NBA is reportedly considering a drastic measure to combat intentional losing: eliminating the NBA draft entirely. This move, proposed by Commissioner Adam Silver, aims to foster greater competitive balance across the league, a goal the NBA has pursued for years.
The current situation has been significantly influenced by the 2023 Collective Bargaining Agreement. This agreement imposed stricter financial penalties on high-spending teams, inadvertently limiting the effectiveness of free agency for player movement. As a result, teams have increasingly turned to the draft as the most viable strategy for acquiring top talent and building competitive rosters.
Proponents of tanking, such as the Oklahoma City Thunder, have demonstrated success by strategically accumulating draft picks. This has created a blueprint that other franchises, desperate to contend, are now following.
However, eliminating the draft presents substantial challenges. Questions arise about how to handle teams that have already amassed significant draft capital. Furthermore, critics argue that removing the draft would likely empower large-market teams by shifting focus back to free agency, potentially exacerbating competitive disparities rather than resolving them.
This proposed solution has drawn sharp criticism, with many suggesting it would undermine the league's competitive integrity. The article posits that this plan, if implemented, would lead to a chaotic system where struggling franchises might overpay for unproven rookies, unlike the structured rookie salary slots seen in the NFL. Such a change could dismantle parity and negatively impact the long-term health of the NBA product.




