Can Lane Kiffin be terminated for cause over tampering allegations?

Yes, attorney Tom Mars stated that proven tampering could constitute grounds for termination for cause under typical coaching contracts.

What is the Demond Williams Jr. contract dispute with Washington?

Demond Williams Jr. is attempting to exit a $4 million revenue-share contract signed with Washington, which the university plans to legally challenge.

Can coaches be sued personally for tampering?

Yes, coaches, as agents of their universities, could be named personally in civil suits for contract interference, and indemnification may not apply.

Home / Sports / Kiffin's Legal Danger: Tampering Claims Escalate

Kiffin's Legal Danger: Tampering Claims Escalate

9 Jan

•

Summary

Attorney warns Lane Kiffin faces termination for cause over tampering.
Demond Williams Jr. seeks to void $4 million contract with Washington.
Tampering claims allow civil suits against coaches personally.

Kiffin's Legal Danger: Tampering Claims Escalate

Lane Kiffin is facing significant legal and contractual jeopardy as alleged tampering connected to the Demond Williams Jr. situation could lead to termination for cause. This adds a new layer of volatility to an already chaotic period in college football. Williams, a Washington Huskies quarterback, is seeking to withdraw from a recently signed $4 million revenue-share contract, a move Washington officials intend to contest legally.

Sports attorney Tom Mars has publicly assessed the potential exposure, stating that tampering claims do not solely rely on NCAA enforcement. Universities can pursue civil claims for contract interference under state law, and head coaches, as university agents, could be personally liable. Mars indicated that most university indemnification agreements would not cover coaches if damages are awarded, especially for unlawful acts outside their employment scope.