Home / Sports / Alcaraz Defends 5-Set Matches: 'Kill Grand Slams'
Alcaraz Defends 5-Set Matches: 'Kill Grand Slams'
1 Oct
Summary
- Alcaraz argues best-of-five sets define Grand Slam uniqueness.
- U.S. Open had record late finishes due to long matches.
- Players suggest calendar reform over format changes.
Carlos Alcaraz recently voiced his strong support for maintaining best-of-five-set matches in men's Grand Slam tournaments, arguing that their removal would diminish the prestige of these major events. He emphasized that this format is integral to what makes Grand Slams unique and special, and he would not advocate for any changes.
Alcaraz's stance follows a U.S. Open that witnessed several matches concluding exceptionally late, including a record-setting finish at 3:33 a.m. This trend raises questions about player physical toll and the spectator experience. While some suggest shortening matches or adopting a four-set format with a tiebreak, the argument for best-of-five highlights its role in separating top players from champions who demonstrate physical resilience and strategic mastery.
Instead of altering the match format, Alcaraz and many other top players believe the solution lies in reforming the extensive tennis calendar. They propose reducing the number of tournaments played consecutively to alleviate the physical strain on athletes. This approach, they contend, would allow players to better manage their physical and mental energy, ensuring peak performance over demanding five-set matches and a long season.
