Why was the 2000 Roundup safety study retracted by Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology?

The journal retracted the study due to serious ethical concerns about the authors' independence and accountability, noting reliance on unpublished Monsanto data without full disclosure.

What is the EPA's role in reassessing glyphosate safety by 2026?

The EPA is legally obligated to re-examine glyphosate's safety by 2026, facing pressure from advocacy groups and public concerns following the retraction of a key safety study.

How has Monsanto's influence on the glyphosate study been revealed?

Emails uncovered during lawsuits against Monsanto showed the company's scientists played a significant role in conceiving, writing, and reviewing the 2000 study.

Home / Health / Roundup Science Fraud Exposed: Paper Retracted After 25 Years

Roundup Science Fraud Exposed: Paper Retracted After 25 Years

2 Jan

•

Summary

A 25-year-old study on Roundup's safety was retracted due to ethical concerns.
Emails reveal Monsanto scientists significantly influenced the study's conception.
The EPA faces a 2026 deadline to reassess glyphosate's safety.

Roundup Science Fraud Exposed: Paper Retracted After 25 Years

A 25-year-old study, previously considered a cornerstone in establishing glyphosate's safety, has been retracted by its publishing journal over ethical concerns. This retraction, occurring a quarter-century after its initial publication, stems from evidence suggesting significant involvement from Monsanto scientists in the study's conception and writing, despite its aim to assure the public of the weedkiller's safety.

The scientific journal cited "serious ethical concerns regarding the independence and accountability of the authors," noting that the paper relied heavily on unpublished Monsanto studies. This revelation has intensified pressure on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to re-examine glyphosate's safety, a process mandated by a federal deadline in 2026 due to legal actions by advocacy groups.