Patient Rights Bill Sparks Outcry in Maharashtra

The Jan Arogya Abhiyan (JAA), a coalition of health rights groups, has voiced strong opposition to the proposed Maharashtra Clinical Establishments Bill 2026. They argue the draft law omits several important patient rights and safeguards previously included in the existing framework. The bill, introduced in the assembly on July 3 and referred to a select committee, has also faced criticism from the Indian Medical Association.

Key omissions highlighted by JAA include provisions preventing hospitals from withholding deceased patients' bodies over non-payment and prohibiting confinement for unpaid medical bills. Specific concerns were raised about the absence of explicit rights for female patients during examinations and clear protocols for HIV patient care. The draft also appears to remove requirements for displaying doctor credentials and providing detailed discharge cards.

Furthermore, the JAA has criticized the proposed grievance redressal mechanism, noting its deficiency compared to the 2021 rules that mandated hospital grievance cells and prompt complaint resolution. The composition of the proposed state council, dominated by government officials, is also contested, with JAA advocating for representation from diverse health advocacy groups and professionals.

Health activists emphasize the need to strengthen, not dilute, patient rights, calling for the incorporation of all existing safeguards and a robust grievance system. The JAA urges the government to conduct broader consultations with civil society and healthcare professionals before finalizing the legislation, with suggestions due by August 20, 2026.