Home / Environment / Expert Slams India's Tiger Census Methods
Expert Slams India's Tiger Census Methods
12 Aug
Summary
- India's wildlife census methods are criticized as outdated.
- Sampling-based scientific estimates are preferred over total counts.
- Lack of training and transparency harms conservation outcomes.
Wildlife biologist Ullas Karanth has voiced significant criticism regarding India's traditional methods for counting tiger, elephant, and prey populations. He contends that the country adopted an incorrect approach in the 1970s, stemming from a lack of modern wildlife biology training among those conducting the surveys. Karanth emphasizes that complete censuses are practically impossible due to the vast landscapes and elusive nature of animals.
Instead, he advocates for scientifically accepted sampling methods to derive statistically sound population estimates. Karanth points out flaws like imperfect detection and uneven animal distribution, which are not adequately addressed by current protocols. He also highlights a lack of transparency in data and analysis, hindering independent scientific scrutiny and potentially masking poor conservation results.
Furthermore, Karanth argues that a lack of proper training for frontline forest officers and an inherent conflict of interest in having management agencies monitor populations undermine data quality. He suggests that conflict zones are not solely indicative of population increases but can also result from human encroachment. The expert stresses that effective conservation requires better science, expertise, and financial resource allocation, rather than flawed counting exercises.
