Home / Environment / Harford Residents Fight 'Worst Site' Battery Storage Plan

Harford Residents Fight 'Worst Site' Battery Storage Plan

Summary

  • Harford County residents oppose a battery storage facility near Deer Creek.
  • Concerns include fire risk and potential water contamination.
  • The company claims newer batteries are safer and sited away from water.
Harford Residents Fight 'Worst Site' Battery Storage Plan

Harford County officials and residents have voiced strong opposition to the proposed Oystercatcher Energy Storage Project, a 500-megawatt battery facility planned near Deer Creek. Concerns center on fire safety and the potential for chemical contamination of the waterway, which supplies drinking water. Critics argue the chosen hillside location, near Norrisville Elementary School, is environmentally inappropriate and poses significant risks.

Tenneka, the project developer, plans to use lithium-ion-phosphate batteries, which they describe as safer than traditional lithium-ion types. They also state the facility will be housed in specialized enclosures with cooling systems and situated at least 600 feet from Deer Creek, preserving most of the forested area. The company has committed to collaborating with local fire departments to develop emergency response plans.

Despite these assurances, local authorities and residents remain skeptical. Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly expressed worries about firefighting access and chemical runoff into Deer Creek. A report for the Maryland Public Service Commission indicated that the Oystercatcher project might not provide sufficient economic benefits to ratepayers. Additionally, local fire departments have expressed concerns about their preparedness for such an emergency.

These concerns were raised as the Maryland Public Service Commission reviewed four battery storage projects for eligibility for new state credits. While other projects elsewhere in Maryland are moving forward, the Harford County proposal has faced significant local backlash, with over 1,300 signatures collected in opposition. Regulators must still approve construction even if projects qualify for credits.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

Read more news on

Property Code: 5571