What is the new EPA rule concerning wetlands?

The EPA finalized a rule that reduces federal protections for many wetlands, especially those not directly connected to rivers and streams.

How will the EPA's wetland rule affect South Dakota?

Nearly 2 million acres of South Dakota's wetlands are at greater risk, impacting water quality, flood control, and local economies.

When is the comment period for the EPA's wetland definition rule?

The comment period for the 'Updated Definition of 'Waters of the United States'' rule began on November 20 and closes on January 5.

Home / Environment / EPA Rollback Threatens Vital Wetlands

EPA Rollback Threatens Vital Wetlands

30 Nov

•

Summary

EPA rule weakens protections for wetlands without continuous surface connections.
Nearly 2 million acres of South Dakota wetlands face new risks.
Wetland loss impacts water quality, flood control, and rural economies.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule that weakens federal protections for vital wetlands. This new regulation specifically targets wetlands without a continuous surface connection to rivers and streams, potentially exposing nearly 2 million acres in South Dakota to increased environmental risks. The change could exacerbate flooding issues and degrade water quality by allowing more pollutants into natural waterways.

The decision has raised concerns about the long-term consequences for both the environment and South Dakota's economy. Wetlands play a crucial role in filtering drinking water, mitigating floods, and supporting diverse wildlife populations that are essential for hunting, fishing, and tourism. Their diminished protection could lead to significant ecological damage and economic losses in rural communities.

While some argue that regulations hinder development, proponents of wetland protection emphasize their long-term economic benefits, including reduced water treatment costs and enhanced resilience against natural disasters. The rollback is seen by many as a short-sighted policy that jeopardizes the natural infrastructure critical for South Dakota's future prosperity and environmental health.