Home / Environment / Ships Speeding Arctic Melt: Black Carbon Crisis
Ships Speeding Arctic Melt: Black Carbon Crisis
9 Feb
Summary
- Ship soot accelerates Arctic ice melt by absorbing sunlight.
- International regulators consider stricter 'polar fuel' rules.
- Black carbon's warming impact is 1,600 times CO2's over 20 years.

Rising global temperatures are causing Arctic sea ice to melt at an accelerated rate, leading to increased ship traffic on previously impassable routes. However, this boom comes at a significant environmental cost as black carbon, or soot, emitted by ships is making the ice melt even faster.
Glaciers and ice covered in this soot reflect less sunlight, absorbing more heat and contributing to the Arctic being the fastest-warming region on Earth. This melting can subsequently affect global weather patterns, creating a cycle of increased warming.
In response, several countries have proposed that the International Maritime Organization (IMO) mandate the use of 'polar fuels' for ships in Arctic waters. These cleaner fuels emit less pollution than traditional residual fuels and would apply to all ships traveling north of the 60th parallel. The proposal is under consideration by IMO committees this week and in April.
Despite these efforts, regulating emissions faces challenges. Geopolitical issues, particularly concerning Greenland and U.S. policy on climate change, have overshadowed environmental concerns. Furthermore, internal tensions exist within Arctic nations, like Iceland, where the powerful fishing industry's economic interests sometimes conflict with environmental regulations.
Data shows a significant increase in Arctic ship traffic and black carbon emissions between 2013 and 2024. The number of ships north of the 60th parallel rose by 37%, while the total distance traversed increased by 111%. Black carbon emissions also climbed, with fishing boats identified as the largest source. A ban on heavy fuel oil, implemented in 2024, has had limited impact due to existing loopholes and waivers.
Environmental groups advocate for regulating ship fuel as the most effective way to reduce black carbon, as limiting traffic itself is deemed impractical due to the economic incentives of fishing, resource extraction, and shorter shipping routes between Asia and Europe. However, the dangers of Arctic routes and pollution concerns have led some major shipping companies to pledge avoidance.




