What are the concerns raised about the Maharashtra scholarship exam?

The Maharashtra State Primary Teachers' Committee has raised concerns that the exam questions in language and mathematics were too difficult for Class 5 students, exceeding the prescribed syllabus and cognitive level.

How did the exam difficulty affect the students?

The challenging questions reportedly caused stress, loss of confidence, anxiety, confusion, and fear of exams among several students after the test.

What improvements are suggested for future scholarship exams?

The teachers' committee urges the examination council to adopt a more scientific approach to paper setting, involving experienced teachers, education experts, and educational psychologists.

Home / Education / Teachers Slam Maharashtra Scholarship Test Difficulty

Teachers Slam Maharashtra Scholarship Test Difficulty

24 Feb

•

Summary

Exam questions exceeded the Class 5 syllabus and cognitive level.
Students experienced stress and loss of confidence due to complexity.
Teachers urge scientific approach with expert involvement in paper setting.

Teachers Slam Maharashtra Scholarship Test Difficulty

The Maharashtra State Primary Teachers' Committee has expressed grave concerns regarding the difficulty level and structure of the state scholarship examination conducted recently. Committee members highlighted that numerous questions in both language and mathematics sections were found to be excessively challenging for Class 5 students, surpassing their cognitive capabilities and the prescribed syllabus. This disparity reportedly led to heightened anxiety and diminished self-assurance among the young examinees.

In response, the teachers' body has submitted a formal representation to the Maharashtra State Examination Council. They cited examples of lengthy reading passages and multi-step mathematical problems requiring advanced reasoning skills. The council chairman acknowledged the feedback, stating that while immediate changes to the conducted exam are impossible, they will review the concerns. He emphasized that the exam's difficulty was uniform, and any impact on scores would affect all participants.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.