Home / Crime and Justice / Silencer Doubt Casts Shadow on 41-Year-Old Conviction
Silencer Doubt Casts Shadow on 41-Year-Old Conviction
27 Feb
Summary
- New expert: Silencer likely not used in Sheila Caffell's shooting.
- Silencer blood evidence questioned due to misrepresentation.
- Bamber's team claims case collapses without silencer evidence.

In 1985, five people, including Sheila Caffell and her twin sons, were found dead at White House Farm. Jeremy Bamber, Sheila's adopted brother, alerted authorities and has been imprisoned for 41 years. Central to his conviction was the silencer found days later, allegedly containing Caffell's blood, suggesting she was murdered after shooting others.
However, a recent analysis by Professor Jason Payne-James, a forensic and legal medicine specialist, casts significant doubt on the silencer's role. He concluded that the bullet injuries are not consistent with a silencer being used. This directly challenges the prosecution's argument that Caffell's blood in the silencer proved Bamber's guilt.
Bamber's legal team contends that without the silencer evidence, which was central to the original trial, the case against him collapses. The prosecution's narrative relied on the silencer's contents and the impossibility of Caffell shooting herself twice, removing the silencer, and then placing it in a cupboard.
Further questions arise regarding the discovery and handling of the silencer, with claims that police possessed multiple silencers, not just the one presented at trial. Previous DNA testing revealed mixed profiles in the moderator, contradicting earlier assertions that it contained only Caffell's blood. Despite these developments, the Criminal Cases Review Commission has been slow to act, leading to frustration.
Jeremy Bamber believes the silencer evidence was manipulated to secure his conviction and that its removal as a central plank of the prosecution's case will lead to his acquittal. Five forensic experts now reportedly agree that a silencer was likely not used.




