Home / Crime and Justice / Sleuths Hijack Missing Person Search for Clicks
Sleuths Hijack Missing Person Search for Clicks
22 Feb
Summary
- Self-proclaimed investigators disrupt active missing person cases.
- Streamers order deliveries to crime scenes, interfering with police.
- Authorities criticize online sleuths for causing harm and misinformation.

The investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie has been marred by the interference of self-declared online sleuths and true crime streamers. These individuals, seeking views and clicks, have inserted themselves into the active search, causing significant disruption. One prominent streamer, Jonathan Lee Riches, who has a history of wire fraud and absurd lawsuits, was observed at the scene, and his followers even ordered food deliveries to the crime scene address, prompting a stern warning from the Pima County Sheriff's Department.
Authorities have criticized these "wannabe reporters" for jeopardizing the serious case and spreading misinformation. Experts note a growing trend of such individuals descending on breaking news, a phenomenon that has escalated with the advent of live streaming. This behavior, driven by the pursuit of clicks and relevance in the true crime world, often involves broadcasting unverified theories and live footage, sometimes leading to altercations or the misinterpretation of mundane events as significant clues.
While some streamers, like Jennifer Youngblood, defend the practice, claiming viewers understand the limitations of their reporting and appreciate the engagement, law enforcement and experienced journalists express deep concern. They argue that this "vulture" behavior erodes public trust in legitimate journalism and hinders genuine investigative efforts by creating a circus atmosphere around sensitive cases.




