Home / Crime and Justice / Schizophrenia, Knife Attack: Not Criminally Responsible Ruling?
Schizophrenia, Knife Attack: Not Criminally Responsible Ruling?
6 Nov
Summary
- Rose attacked two people with a knife due to schizophrenia-induced hallucinations.
- A forensic psychiatrist recommended Rose be found not criminally responsible.
- The judge will decide on December 15th whether Rose is NCR.
Mitchell Rose was experiencing hallucinations from schizophrenia when he attacked two people in a St. John's apartment building on December 8, 2025, armed with a large kitchen knife. Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Jasbir Gill, who has treated Rose since the attacks, testified that Rose believed he was being targeted by electromagnetic waves and conspiracies, causing him to feel unsafe.
Dr. Gill recommended that Rose be found not criminally responsible for his actions, a stance that was endorsed by both the Crown and the defence. The psychiatrist explained that Rose's persecutory delusions prevented him from appreciating the moral wrongfulness of his actions. Rose has been in treatment at the Mental Health and Addictions Centre since his arrest shortly after the incidents.
Following his arrest, Rose was assessed and found fit to stand trial in February. However, criminal responsibility refers to a person's state of mind at the time of the alleged offense. Judge James Walsh is expected to deliver his decision on December 15th regarding the NCR recommendation. If found not criminally responsible, Rose's case will go to the Criminal Code Mental Disorder Review Board.
