Home / Crime and Justice / Privacy Win: Countess Spencer Case Settled
Privacy Win: Countess Spencer Case Settled
23 Apr
Summary
- Catrine Jarman's privacy litigation with Countess Spencer has concluded.
- Jarman stated she was distressed by the disclosure of her MS diagnosis.
- The settlement was reached in December last year with no admission of liability.
The privacy litigation between Catrine Jarman and Countess Spencer concluded with a statement in open court from Jarman. The case arose after Jarman claimed Countess Karen had revealed her Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis. Jarman stated she was profoundly distressed by the disclosure of her medical information and sought to vindicate her right to privacy.
Her legal counsel read a statement expressing relief that the proceedings have ended, and Jarman wishes to put the matter behind her. While she feared discrimination due to her diagnosis, she has used her public profile to promote awareness of MS, working with the MS Society.
The case was settled in December of the previous year. A spokesperson for Countess Spencer confirmed the resolution, stating there was no admission of liability or wrongdoing. Earl Spencer was ordered to pay legal costs exceeding £2 million and £4,500 in damages to Jarman.
Catrine Jarman's spokesperson highlighted that the facts were put on the public record, emphasizing that the decision on when to disclose her diagnosis belonged solely to her. Earl Spencer issued a separate statement, commending Catrine's grace and integrity, and reinforcing the right to privacy for those living with MS.
Tom, Catrine's ex-husband, who initially informed the Countess of the diagnosis, expressed regret over the disclosure of their sensitive discussions, noting the distressing and harmful impact. Countess Spencer's representative reiterated her position that the matter is closed, with no admission of liability.
