What are the main concerns regarding R. Akash Delison's post-mortem report?

Forensic experts have raised concerns about significant discrepancies between the initial medical findings and the final autopsy report, including inconsistencies in the cause of death and the nature of severe injuries.

Why are the leg injuries in the Sivaganga custodial death case considered inconsistent with the police narrative?

The report describes 'through and through' fractures which experts argue are not typical of injuries sustained from falling off a bridge, suggesting they resulted from targeted impact or severe blows.

Did the autopsy for R. Akash Delison follow required NHRC guidelines?

No, the expert alleged that the autopsy failed to adhere to National Human Rights Commission guidelines, omitting critical data and standard protocols for identifying torture.

Home / Crime and Justice / Forensic Expert Flags Discrepancies in Custodial Death Case

Forensic Expert Flags Discrepancies in Custodial Death Case

11 Mar

Summary

Post-mortem report shows inconsistencies with initial findings.
Severe leg injuries inconsistent with alleged fall from bridge.
Autopsy failed to follow NHRC guidelines and protocols.

Forensic Expert Flags Discrepancies in Custodial Death Case

Concerns have been mounting over the post-mortem report concerning R. Akash Delison, a 26-year-old Scheduled Caste individual who reportedly died in police custody in Sivaganga district.

A forensic expert has identified critical inconsistencies between the initial Medico-Legal Case report and the final autopsy. While the initial assessment suggested fat embolism, the autopsy noted no fat globules in the heart chambers. Furthermore, severe leg injuries, described as 'through and through' fractures, are deemed inconsistent with the police's explanation of a fall from a bridge.

The expert also highlighted that the autopsy failed to adhere to National Human Rights Commission guidelines mandated by the Madras High Court. Crucial details like the timing and duration of wounds, and the distinction between fresh and old injuries, were omitted. Standard protocols for identifying torture were also ignored.

Questions have also arisen regarding the timely release of the autopsy report, with a significant delay noted between the procedure's completion and the report's generation. This delay, the expert suggests, could provide an opportunity to suppress or alter findings.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.