Home / Crime and Justice / Rap Lyrics Used in Texas Death Penalty Case
Rap Lyrics Used in Texas Death Penalty Case
10 Mar
Summary
- Rappers file brief supporting inmate facing execution.
- Prosecutors used inmate's rap lyrics in sentencing.
- Artists argue lyrics are fiction, not confessions.

Prominent figures in the music industry, including Killer Mike, T.I., and Travis Scott, have submitted briefs to the Supreme Court regarding the case of James Garfield Broadnax. Broadnax, a Black man, is currently on death row in Texas, and his execution is scheduled for next month. His legal team is seeking a stay of execution and review of his case.
In 2009, Broadnax was convicted of two murders by an almost all-white jury. Prosecutors introduced his handwritten rap lyrics during the sentencing phase, which the jury reviewed multiple times. The musicians and scholars argue that using rap lyrics as evidence of future dangerousness is unconstitutional and amounts to a penalty on artistic expression, particularly impacting music created by minority artists.
Their filings assert that rap lyrics are often fictional narratives, not autobiographical confessions, and that taking them out of context criminalizes the entire genre. The legal teams contend that the use of Broadnax's lyrics was intended to exploit anti-rap bias and anti-Black sentiment, thereby stoking racial prejudice within the proceedings. They are urging the Supreme Court to clarify constitutional limits on using artistic expression as evidence.
Texas lawyers, however, argue that Broadnax's attorneys raised objections about the lyrics too late and that the lyrics constituted only a small part of their arguments. The artists maintain that rap music is an interpretation of the human spirit and not an admission of guilt.




