Home / Crime and Justice / Mackenzie Shirilla Fights Murder Convictions from Prison
Mackenzie Shirilla Fights Murder Convictions from Prison
30 Jul
Summary
- Shirilla challenges murder convictions in federal court
- Claims insufficient evidence for adult court transfer
- Alleges failure to investigate medical condition

Mackenzie Shirilla is pursuing a new legal avenue, challenging her murder convictions from federal court. She is requesting a judge to overturn her convictions and grant a new trial, asserting that nearly every aspect of the case against her is flawed.
Her legal counsel contends that there was inadequate evidence to move her case from juvenile to adult court, given she was 17 at the time of the crash. Furthermore, the defense claims insufficient evidence existed to convict her of intentionally killing her boyfriend, Dominic Russo, and their friend, Davion Flanagan.
The petition also alleges her trial attorneys failed to introduce evidence suggesting Russo might have been involved in controlling the vehicle before it crashed at approximately 100 miles per hour into a building. Additionally, the legal team claims her lawyers neglected to thoroughly investigate her nervous-system disorder, which can induce fainting and dizziness.
Mackenzie is also contesting modifications to the victims' coroner reports and testimony from a medical examiner who reportedly did not conduct the autopsies personally. This federal filing follows the Ohio Supreme Court's decision not to hear her initial appeal, though a motion for reconsideration is still pending.