Home / Crime and Justice / Widow's remarriage won't deny daughter's inheritance
Widow's remarriage won't deny daughter's inheritance
14 Sep
Summary
- Mother's remarriage didn't affect daughter's inheritance rights.
- Daughter inherited father's share as Class I legal heir.
- Old law restriction applied only to widow, not others.

The Madras High Court has clarified inheritance rights, ruling that a widow's remarriage under the old Hindu Succession Act of 1956 did not affect her daughter's independent right to inherit from her father. The judgment, delivered on August 25, 2026, by Justice P.B. Balaji, specifically addressed the impact of the unamended Section 24 of the Act.
This section previously disqualified certain widows from inheriting if they remarried. However, the court determined that this disqualification applied solely to the widow herself and did not extinguish the deceased man's share in joint family property or automatically transfer it to other coparceners. Consequently, the daughter, Lalithamani, was able to inherit her father Venkatesan's coparcenary interest as a Class I legal heir.
The ruling emphasizes that a disqualification affecting one heir cannot automatically disqualify another. The daughter's right to inherit was independent of her mother's marital status post-father's death. This reinforces the principle that individual inheritance rights are distinct and cannot be negated by circumstances affecting another heir.
It is crucial to note that this judgment pertains to succession governed by the law applicable before the 2005 amendment, which omitted Section 24. Current inheritance laws do not impose such a restriction on remarried widows. The case underscores that inheritance is determined by the law in effect when succession opens and by each heir's individual status.