Home / Crime and Justice / Chris Brown Dog Attack Trial: Rihanna Assault Evidence Debated

Chris Brown Dog Attack Trial: Rihanna Assault Evidence Debated

Summary

  • Brown seeks to bar Rihanna assault mention in dog-bite trial.
  • Housekeeper argues Rihanna assault evidence is needed for rebuttal.
  • Dog-bite trial for former housekeeper set for June 15.
Chris Brown Dog Attack Trial: Rihanna Assault Evidence Debated

Chris Brown is asking a judge to prohibit any references to his 2009 felony assault of Rihanna at his impending dog-bite trial. The housekeeper who is suing him contends that Brown's request for a blanket ban is overly broad and premature. She argues the 2009 assault evidence could be admissible for impeachment or rebuttal if Brown's defense portrays him as non-violent.

The trial for Maria Avila, who alleges she was viciously attacked by Brown's dog on December 12, 2020, is set to commence on June 15. Avila claims the mauling resulted in permanent disfigurement and nerve damage. Brown has contested the case, stating he heard the dog growling and found the housekeeper face down, but denies seeing blood or having knowledge of the dog's removal afterward.

Avila's lawsuit details a brutal attack where a large dog mauled her face and arm, requiring emergency surgery. She disputes Brown's account, asserting she didn't see him remove the dog and believes he called 911. Brown's motions to exclude evidence are scheduled for argument on June 5.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

Read more news on

Property Code: 5571