Home / Crime and Justice / Canadian Court Upholds Stay for Non-Communicating Accused
Canadian Court Upholds Stay for Non-Communicating Accused
9 Jul
Summary
- Accused is deaf, cannot speak, read, or write.
- Defense cited language deprivation syndrome for inability to communicate.
- Court upheld stay, preventing trial due to fair trial rights.
An appellate court in Alberta, Canada, has affirmed a lower court's decision to stay proceedings for Kendal Longclaws, 34, who faces multiple charges including sexual interference and sexual assault. The court unanimously ruled that Longclaws cannot receive a fair trial due to his profound communication challenges.
Longclaws is deaf, unable to speak, read, or write, and communicates only through a limited set of gestures with his parents. His defense team presented expert testimony indicating he suffers from language deprivation syndrome, preventing him from understanding legal proceedings or instructing his counsel.
The Crown had appealed a lower court's decision, arguing that a fitness assessment should have been ordered. However, the appellate judges found no error in the trial judge's determination that continuing the prosecution would violate Longclaws' fundamental right to a fair trial.
Upholding the stay, the court acknowledged the serious implications of deeming an accused unfit, which could lead to prolonged detention without conviction. The Crown's appeal was consequently dismissed.
