Who was acquitted in the 15-year legal battle?

Both a businessman and a traffic constable were acquitted in the 15-year legal battle stemming from a 2011 parking dispute.

Why were the businessman and traffic constable acquitted?

The judge found exaggerated and colored evidence in the prosecution's case and noted inconsistencies in both parties' accounts, leading to acquittals.

What did the judge say about citizen vulnerability?

The judge observed that citizens accused of obstructing or assaulting officers are in a vulnerable position and cautioned against using criminal law for retaliation.

Home / Crime and Justice / Businessman, Cop Acquitted in 15-Year Legal Battle

Businessman, Cop Acquitted in 15-Year Legal Battle

9 Feb

•

Summary

Businessman and traffic cop acquitted in 2011 cross-cases.
Judge found exaggerated evidence and zeal to convict on both sides.
Court noted citizen's vulnerability against state machinery.

Businessman, Cop Acquitted in 15-Year Legal Battle

A sessions court recently concluded a lengthy 15-year legal dispute by acquitting both a businessman and a traffic constable involved in a 2011 incident. The judge determined that the prosecution's case against the businessman was based on exaggerated and colored evidence, aimed at punishing him unnecessarily.

In a parallel judgment, the traffic constable was also acquitted after the businessman filed a counter-case alleging assault. The court found significant inconsistencies in the testimonies of both parties, suggesting that their versions of events were overly embellished.

The presiding judge emphasized that the law's purpose is not to punish citizens for challenging authority but to address genuine obstructions. He noted the inherent vulnerability of private citizens when facing state apparatus, cautioning against the misuse of criminal law as a tool for retaliation. Both cases were originally registered at Gamdevi police station following a parking dispute on Babulnath Road.