Advertisement

Home / Crime and Justice / Bombay High Court Overturns Controversial Divorce Decree, Orders Fresh Hearing

Bombay High Court Overturns Controversial Divorce Decree, Orders Fresh Hearing

Summary

  • Bombay High Court quashed family court's divorce decree against wife
  • Family court ignored legal position that lack of evidence doesn't mean automatic decree
  • Husband remarried during wife's appeal, but High Court still quashed the decree
Bombay High Court Overturns Controversial Divorce Decree, Orders Fresh Hearing

In a major development, the Bombay High Court has quashed and set aside a divorce decree passed by a Mumbai family court in November 2024. The High Court observed that the family court had ignored the well-established legal position that merely because a party did not lead evidence or file a written statement, the proceedings cannot be automatically decreed in favor of the other party.

The case involved a couple married in 2017 under the Special Marriage Act. The husband had accused the wife of cruelty and sought a divorce, which the family court granted in November 2024 after the wife remained absent from the proceedings. However, the High Court was dissatisfied with the "casual and mechanical approach" of the family court, stating that the lower court failed to independently analyze the merits of the case and merely relied on the husband's unchallenged testimony.

Notably, the husband had remarried during the pendency of the wife's appeal, but the High Court ruled that the flawed nature of the family court's order warranted it to be quashed. The High Court has now directed the matter to be heard afresh, allowing the wife to file her written statement and both parties to cross-examine their respective witnesses.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

Advertisement

The Bombay High Court quashed and set aside the divorce decree passed by the Mumbai family court, stating the lower court had ignored well-settled legal principles.
The High Court was dissatisfied with the "casual and mechanical approach" of the family court, which had dissolved the marriage solely based on the husband's unchallenged testimony without independently analyzing the merits of the case.
The High Court has directed the matter to be heard afresh, allowing the wife to file her written statement and both parties to cross-examine their respective witnesses.

Read more news on