Home / Business and Economy / Veteran Intel Board Members Warn of Impending Fab Decline, Urge U.S. Intervention

Veteran Intel Board Members Warn of Impending Fab Decline, Urge U.S. Intervention

Summary

  • Four former Intel board members warn of "gradual exit" from chip manufacturing
  • Cite "missed deadlines, poor execution, and misguided strategy" behind Intel's woes
  • Recommend U.S. government-backed partnership to acquire Intel's fabrication assets
Veteran Intel Board Members Warn of Impending Fab Decline, Urge U.S. Intervention

According to a recent report, four former Intel board members have expressed grave concerns about the company's future in chip manufacturing. Charlene Barshefsky, Reed Hundt, James Plummer, and David B. Yoffie, who collectively served on Intel's board for over 70 years, paint a dire picture of the company's current state.

The quartet warns that Intel is in the process of a "gradual exit" from chip manufacturing, and that the U.S. government needs to intervene quickly to save the company's fabrication facilities before "the rust of time makes them worthless." They cite "missed deadlines, poor execution, and a misguided strategy" as the root causes behind Intel's woes, leading to the once-dominant chipmaker now appearing to be "dropping out of the race" to manufacture the most advanced semiconductors.

The former board members lament that their recommendations to spin off Intel's fabs into a separate entity have not been adopted, arguing that while it may make commercial sense for Intel to exit advanced chip manufacturing, the company's fabrication assets are too strategically important to the U.S. to be allowed to decline. They call for a "public-private partnership" involving future customers, investors, and government financing to acquire Intel's fabrication assets before they become irreparably damaged.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.

FAQ

Former Intel board members are concerned about Intel's "gradual exit" from chip manufacturing, citing "missed deadlines, poor execution, and a misguided strategy" behind the company's current struggles.
The former board members recommend a "public-private partnership" involving future customers, investors, and government financing to acquire Intel's fabrication assets before they become "worthless."
The former board members warn that if Intel retreats from advanced chip manufacturing, the future of America's leadership in AI and advanced electronics will be "firmly in the hands of two firms: TSMC and Samsung," both headquartered outside the U.S.

Read more news on