Home / Business and Economy / Founder Admits Rapid Expansion Caused Good Glamm Group's Collapse
Founder Admits Rapid Expansion Caused Good Glamm Group's Collapse
4 Aug
Summary
- Founder Darpan Sanghvi says aggressive growth strategy led to downfall
- Lenders enforced charges on individual brands, ending house of brands model
- Sanghvi cites spreading too thin, rushed execution, and scaling unproven bets

In a recent LinkedIn post, Darpan Sanghvi, the founder and CEO of the troubled content-to-commerce unicorn Good Glamm Group, has acknowledged that the company's aggressive and rapid expansion strategy was the primary reason for its collapse. Just days earlier, lenders had moved to enforce charges on Good Glamm's individual brands, effectively dismantling the so-called house of brands business model.
Sanghvi reflected on the company's downfall, stating that "Momentum is intoxicating. Until you drown in it." He pointed to three key factors that led to Good Glamm's demise: the company spread itself too thin across multiple fronts, rushed execution, and scaled unproven bets too quickly. The company had acquired 11 companies in rapid succession, entered five beauty and personal-care categories simultaneously, and attempted to build both a tech-led D2C business and a traditional offline presence, all of which caused scattered focus and unsustainable complexity.
The execution was similarly rushed, with ten acquisitions completed in just nine months, 50 offline stores opened within months, and 1,000 corporate employees hired in a single quarter. Meanwhile, the company scaled D2C orders from 1 lakh to 15 lakh per month without first optimizing unit economics, leading to bloated marketing costs and operational fragility.
As a result of the lenders' actions, Good Glamm's portfolio brands, such as MyGlamm, The Moms Co., Organic Harvest, Sirona, and POPxo, are now being sold individually, marking the end of the ecommerce company's attempt to blend content creation with beauty and personal-care commerce.