Home / Business and Economy / Giving Time vs. Money: What's More Impactful?

Giving Time vs. Money: What's More Impactful?

Summary

  • People often believe donating time is more impactful than money.
  • Research indicates money donations are typically more effective.
  • Highlighting financial gift impact influences donation decisions.
Giving Time vs. Money: What's More Impactful?

People tend to believe that donating their time is more personally impactful and effective than giving money, according to new research. This perception, however, often disconnects from reality, as studies have demonstrated that monetary donations are typically more cost-effective and achieve a greater impact.

The research highlights that individuals feel a stronger personal connection to their time donations, leading them to perceive it as more meaningful. This subjective feeling can outweigh objective effectiveness, causing people to opt for volunteering even when donating money would yield better results for the cause.

Findings suggest that clearly communicating the high efficiency and impact of financial contributions can significantly influence donor behavior. Nonprofits can leverage this by de-biasing donor perceptions through targeted communications that emphasize the concrete benefits of monetary gifts, thereby potentially increasing overall charitable giving.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Research indicates that monetary donations are generally more effective and cost-efficient than donating time, despite common perceptions.
People often feel a greater personal connection and 'self-gift overlap' with their time, leading them to believe it's more meaningful.
Charities can encourage money donations by clearly communicating the high efficiency and actual impact of financial gifts to potential donors.

Read more news on