Home / Business and Economy / Meta Pulls Ads Targeting Lawsuit Plaintiffs
Meta Pulls Ads Targeting Lawsuit Plaintiffs
10 Apr
Summary
- Meta is removing ads seeking plaintiffs for lawsuits against social media companies.
- The company lost two key trials recently, including a $6 million verdict in March.
- Thousands of lawsuits alleging addictive platform designs are pending against major tech firms.

Meta Platforms has announced on Thursday, April 9, 2026, its decision to remove advertisements from Facebook and Instagram that were aimed at recruiting new plaintiffs for ongoing litigation. These lawsuits allege that Meta and other social media companies designed their platforms to be addictive for young users.
Meta's spokesperson, Andy Stone, stated that the company is actively defending itself against these lawsuits, which encompass thousands of cases in both state and federal courts. He emphasized, "We will not allow trial lawyers to profit from our platforms while simultaneously claiming they are harmful."
This strategic move comes shortly after Meta experienced losses in two critical trials concerning these allegations. In late March 2026, a Los Angeles jury found Meta and Alphabet's Google liable, ordering them to pay $6 million. This verdict followed claims that the platforms contributed to a young woman's depression and suicidal thoughts due to addiction.
Furthermore, a separate case in New Mexico concluded just a day prior to Meta's announcement, where jurors ordered Meta to pay $375 million. The company was found to have misled users about product safety for young individuals and facilitated child sexual exploitation.
Currently, over 3,300 lawsuits involving addiction claims are pending in California state court against Meta, Google, Snap Inc., and ByteDance. An additional 2,400 lawsuits filed by various entities like municipalities, states, and school districts have been centralized in California federal court.
These companies have consistently denied the allegations, asserting that they implement extensive measures to ensure the safety of teens and young users on their platforms. The state court cases primarily involve individual claims of mental health harm due to social media addiction, while federal litigation includes public entities seeking to address the financial burden of treating mental health fallout among young people.