Home / Arts and Entertainment / Wicked Part 2 Falls Flat: A Disappointing Sequel
Wicked Part 2 Falls Flat: A Disappointing Sequel
18 Nov
Summary
- The second half of Wicked is criticized for relying too heavily on "The Wizard of Oz" references.
- New original songs added to the movie version are deemed worse than existing ones.
- The film's split into two parts is called a disastrous decision, leading to excessive filler.

The latter half of the "Wicked" film adaptation, "Wicked: For Good," is facing considerable criticism for its perceived failure to capture the magic of its predecessor. Reviewers note a sharp decline in quality, with the film leaning heavily on references to "The Wizard of Oz" rather than developing its own narrative strength. The inclusion of new musical numbers has been described as a misstep, failing to measure up to the memorable songs from the first part.
Splitting the beloved musical into two lengthy films has also drawn ire, with "Wicked: For Good" being characterized by extensive filler and a pacing that makes its nearly five-hour runtime feel excessive. This division is viewed as a fundamentally flawed decision that dilutes the overall experience. Performers like Cynthia Erivo are noted as struggling with underwritten characters and uninspired material, despite Ariana Grande's consistent performance.
The film's visual aesthetic has also been a point of contention, with a digital look described as washed-out. Despite its shortcomings, the film is expected to be a commercial success, potentially leading to a third installment. However, the critical reception for "Wicked: For Good" is markedly negative, with some calling it one of the year's biggest disappointments.




