Why did Vivek Oberoi file a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court?

Vivek Oberoi filed a civil suit in the Delhi High Court to protect his personality and publicity rights against the alleged misuse of his identity through fake social media accounts, unauthorized merchandise, and AI-generated content.

What does Vivek Oberoi hope to achieve with this lawsuit?

He seeks a permanent injunction to stop the infringement of his rights, requesting the removal of unauthorized posts, merchandise, and content, and aiming to prevent further misuse of his identity.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / Vivek Oberoi Fights AI Deepfakes in Delhi Court

Vivek Oberoi Fights AI Deepfakes in Delhi Court

Q: What specific types of misuse is Vivek Oberoi suing over?

The lawsuit addresses the use of fake social media accounts, the sale of unauthorized merchandise featuring his likeness, and the creation of misleading AI-generated content and deepfakes.

5 Feb

•

Summary

Vivek Oberoi seeks protection for his identity rights in Delhi High Court.
The suit targets fake social media accounts and unauthorized merchandise.
AI-generated content and deepfake technology misuse is a major concern.

Vivek Oberoi Fights AI Deepfakes in Delhi Court

Actor Vivek Oberoi has initiated legal proceedings in the Delhi High Court to safeguard his personality and publicity rights. The civil suit addresses the alleged pervasive misuse of his identity, including the proliferation of fake social media accounts, the sale of unauthorized merchandise, and the creation of AI-generated content.

Oberoi's legal team seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the infringement of his rights. The petition highlights instances of impersonation on social media platforms and the sale of unauthorized merchandise featuring his likeness on e-commerce sites. This action underscores the actor's concern over the exploitation of his persona without consent.

A significant focus of the lawsuit is the alleged misuse of artificial intelligence and deepfake technology. Oberoi contends that misleading and derogatory depictions, including the superimposition of his face onto objectionable imagery, are being spread. This misuse, he argues, poses a substantial risk to his reputation, leading to public confusion and the dilution of his personal identity.