Duffer Brothers' Show Model Backfires?

As the final season of "Stranger Things" nears, a decade after its premiere, concerns arise over its drawn-out production model. The extended hiatuses between seasons, compounded by the decision to split Season 4 into two volumes, have arguably lessened anticipation rather than built it. This strategy has led to fan weariness and a sense of indifference, deviating from the traditional TV model that once defined the show.

Issues like artificial cliffhangers, such as Nancy's peril in the Upside Down, and plot devices like Argyle's character, are cited as examples of narrative stretching. These choices, along with the introduction of longer episodes and mid-season breaks, have been criticized for feeling contrived and lacking narrative substance, ultimately diluting the suspense and impact of key plot points.

The show's model, adopted by other Netflix series, attempts to combat binge-watching by staggering releases. However, evidence suggests this approach leads to significant viewership drops, as seen with "Wednesday." While "Stranger Things" has achieved immense success, its flawed release strategy may prove unsustainable for future productions, impacting profitability and audience engagement.