Phil Dunster on Playing Loveable Assholes

Phil Dunster, celebrated for his role as Jamie Tartt, now navigates the complexities of Professor Archie in "Rooster." This character, unlike his "Ted Lasso" counterpart, ends the first season in a self-imposed miserable state, having alienated both a student with whom he's expecting a child and his estranged wife. Dunster skillfully embodies these difficult characters, walking a fine line to keep them entertaining yet believably terrible.

Dunster reflects on the challenge of portraying such figures, noting the audience's desire to like them despite their poor choices. He draws parallels to British actors known for playing complex antagonists, finding playfulness in these roles. His acting philosophy centers on serving the text and character, trusting that even unlikeable traits add depth and texture, making them more engaging.

The actor is keen on variety, seeking diverse roles akin to Oscar Isaac's career. While Archie may share some traits with him, Dunster emphasizes the character's nuances compared to Jamie Tartt. He feels grateful for "Ted Lasso's" impact, which opened doors to projects that resonate with audiences, creating a magical connection.

Dunster's preparation for Archie involved extensive research into Russian history, inspired by figures like Peter the Great. This academic deep-dive, though ultimately cut short by script changes, provided insight into Archie's grandiose self-perception. The actor views such characters as inspirational, seeing a reflection of their brilliance, even when coupled with negative actions, within Archie's studies.

Looking ahead, Dunster anticipates "Rooster's" arc will involve a descent into darkness followed by a potential finding of light, a common narrative structure in streaming. He stresses that any redemption for complex characters must be earned, acknowledging that some characters may simply remain flawed, a sentiment that mirrors contemporary societal observations of powerful figures evading responsibility.