Home / Arts and Entertainment / LexisNexis Denies Lawyer's AI Blame Game
LexisNexis Denies Lawyer's AI Blame Game
4 Dec
Summary
- Lawyer cited non-existent cases, blamed AI
- LexisNexis states lawyer wasn't authorized user
- Lawyer faces arrest and indictment in separate case

Legal documents filed by Fat Joe's attorneys claim the opposing counsel, Tyrone, fabricated legal precedents by citing non-existent cases. Tyrone's defense was that mistakes were due to a LexisNexis AI feature, an excuse now being publicly refuted by the legal technology company.
In a letter submitted by Fat Joe's legal team, LexisNexis clarified that Tyrone was not an authorized user or subscriber to their AI products. The company explicitly stated they bear no responsibility for the legal errors made. Tyrone, however, insists he utilized LexisNexis for his research.
Tyrone further stated his intention to publish his research and an invoice from LexisNexis, which he claims he refused to pay. This situation unfolds as Tyrone is also facing unrelated charges, including arrest and indictment for allegedly running over a process server.




