What does David Furnish claim about the stories published about him and Elton John?

David Furnish claims that judgmental and narrow-minded stories about him and Elton John were written using information allegedly secured through unlawful means, including phone tapping and private investigators.

Who else is involved in the lawsuit against the publisher?

Besides David Furnish and Elton John, the group of claimants suing Associated Newspapers Ltd includes Prince Harry and four other individuals.

What is the publisher's response to the allegations?

Associated Newspapers Ltd denies all the allegations, stating that the articles in question were sourced from legitimate contacts, the couple's spokesperson, and prior articles, and that claims related to Furnish and John are groundless.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / John & Furnish: Violated by unlawful news gathering

John & Furnish: Violated by unlawful news gathering

5 Feb

•

Summary

David Furnish claims stolen information led to judgmental stories.
He and Elton John feel 'violated' by alleged phone tapping.
Seven claimants, including Prince Harry, sue publisher.

John & Furnish: Violated by unlawful news gathering

David Furnish has voiced strong condemnation, calling it an "abomination" that information allegedly obtained through unlawful methods was used to publish judgmental stories about him and Elton John. He expressed that he and John felt "violated" by these actions, which reportedly involved phone tapping and the use of private investigators.

Furnish detailed his feelings in written submissions to the high court, where he is part of a group of seven claimants, including Prince Harry. They are suing Associated Newspapers Ltd, alleging that the company orchestrated unlawful information gathering to generate news stories. ANL has denied all claims, asserting that the challenged articles were derived from various legitimate sources, including journalists' contacts and official statements.

Furnish's perspective shifted after actor Elizabeth Hurley informed him in February 2021 about allegations of unlawful tactics. He stated that without her intervention, they would not have known about the alleged breaches of law and intrusion into their private lives. The claimants allege that voicemail interceptions and other unlawful methods were employed for 10 articles published between 2000 and 2015, alongside two separate alleged incidents of unlawful gathering that did not result in publication.