Home / Arts and Entertainment / Rap Lyric Lawsuits Called 'Dangerous' by Scholars
Rap Lyric Lawsuits Called 'Dangerous' by Scholars
6 Apr
Summary
- Scholars argue Drake consented to rap battle, barring lawsuit.
- Litigation over rap lyrics is deemed a dangerous precedent.
- Drake sued Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar's diss track.
Legal scholars from Yale University are strongly criticizing Drake's lawsuit against Universal Music Group concerning Kendrick Lamar's Grammy-winning song "Not Like Us." They contend that Drake implicitly consented to the lyrical exchange by goading Lamar, thus forfeiting his right to sue for defamation. The scholars argue that litigation over rap lyrics is a dangerous precedent, potentially opening the door to racial bias in courtrooms.
Drake's January lawsuit accused UMG of defaming him by promoting Lamar's track, which labeled him a "certified pedophile." However, the initial dismissal in October cited the figurative and hyperbolic nature of diss tracks. As Drake appeals this ruling, external groups are filing briefs, including scholars concerned about the use of rap lyrics as evidence. They emphasize that diss tracks are understood as demonstrations of skill and dominance, not literal factual assertions.
