Why was the lawsuit against Cardi B dismissed in Texas?

The lawsuit against Cardi B was dismissed in Texas because the judge ruled there was a lack of personal jurisdiction, meaning the court did not have the authority to hear the case.

What did Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar accuse Cardi B of doing?

Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar accused Cardi B of sampling portions of their song 'Greasy Frybread' without permission on her song 'Enough (Miami)'.

Who were the defendants in the lawsuit against Cardi B?

The defendants in the lawsuit were Cardi B, along with her record labels Atlantic Records and Warner Music Group.

Home / Arts and Entertainment / Cardi B Lawsuit Dismissed in Texas Court

Cardi B Lawsuit Dismissed in Texas Court

31 Mar

•

Summary

Lawsuit against Cardi B dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.
Artists claimed Cardi B sampled their song 'Greasy Frybread'.
The case was filed in Texas but lacked personal jurisdiction.

Cardi B Lawsuit Dismissed in Texas Court

Cardi B has won a legal dismissal of a copyright infringement lawsuit filed against her and her record labels in Texas. The suit was initiated in July 2024 by Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar, who perform as Kemika 1956.

They alleged that Cardi B, Atlantic Records, and Warner Music Group illegally used elements of their 2021 song "Greasy Frybread." The accusation centered on the claim that these portions were incorporated into Cardi B's March 2024 single, "Enough (Miami)."

However, a judge in Texas dismissed the case based on a lack of personal jurisdiction. This ruling signifies that the court determined it did not possess the authority to adjudicate the dispute as presented. The plaintiffs' next legal steps are currently unknown.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.