Home / Arts and Entertainment / Boys' Film Sparks Debate: Ethics vs. Artistry
Boys' Film Sparks Debate: Ethics vs. Artistry
10 Feb
Summary
- 2003 film 'Boys' is being re-evaluated due to a recent bus incident.
- Viral scenes depict controversial behavior, sparking online criticism.
- Supporters argue cinema reflects reality, while critics cite social responsibility.

Shankar's 2003 film 'Boys' has resurfaced in public discourse, approximately two decades after its release. This renewed attention stems from a recent bus incident in Kozhikode, Kerala, which tragically led to a suicide, subsequent arrests, and widespread social media discussion. These events prompted many to recall scenes from 'Boys' that depicted men crossing boundaries with women, placing director Shankar under scrutiny.
Clips from the song 'Enakkoru Girlfriend Venumada,' featuring actors Siddharth, Nakul, Bharath, Thaman, and Manikandan, are circulating online. These scenes, which show stalking and offensive comments, are being labeled as toxic. Many observers suggest that if the film were released today, Shankar would likely face significant online backlash, adding to existing criticism following his recent film 'Indian 2'.
However, a segment of the public is defending Shankar and the film. They argue that depicting negative behavior in cinema does not equate to directorial endorsement, drawing parallels to the portrayal of violence or terrorism. Supporters emphasize that cinema serves as a reflection of society and reality, suggesting 'Boys' explores youthful confusion and mistakes, with the characters eventually finding redemption through music.
Further debate questions the responsibility of filmmakers, with some asserting that serious social issues should not be presented casually. Critics worry that such scenes can send inappropriate messages to young viewers. While 'Boys' faced criticism upon its initial release, the advent of social media has amplified these concerns, transforming the discussion into a broader examination of social responsibility and cinematic ethics.




