Home / Arts and Entertainment / Regulator Slams BBC's Failure to Disclose Presenter's Hamas Ties

Regulator Slams BBC's Failure to Disclose Presenter's Hamas Ties

Summary

  • BBC documentary on Gaza war narrated by child of Hamas minister
  • Ofcom ruled documentary was "materially misleading" to audiences
  • BBC acknowledged serious editorial failing in not disclosing this fact
Regulator Slams BBC's Failure to Disclose Presenter's Hamas Ties

On October 17, 2025, the UK media regulator Ofcom delivered a scathing verdict against the BBC, ruling that the broadcaster's documentary "Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone" was "materially misleading" to its audience. The documentary, which premiered on February 17, 2025, was narrated by the child of a Hamas minister, a fact that was not disclosed to viewers.

Ofcom concluded that this failing had the "potential to erode the significantly high levels of trust" that audiences place in the BBC as a public service broadcaster. The regulator emphasized that trust is at the heart of the relationship between a broadcaster and its audience, and the BBC's lack of transparency in this case was a serious breach of that trust.

The BBC has already acknowledged the editorial failing, admitting that it was a serious mistake not to inform viewers of the narrator's Hamas ties. Now, Ofcom has ordered the BBC to broadcast a live statement on television addressing the issue and the regulator's findings.

Disclaimer: This story has been auto-aggregated and auto-summarised by a computer program. This story has not been edited or created by the Feedzop team.
Ofcom ruled that the BBC's documentary "Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone" was "materially misleading" because it failed to disclose that the narrator was the child of a Hamas minister.
The BBC has acknowledged that it was a serious editorial failing not to inform viewers of the narrator's Hamas ties, and Ofcom has ordered the BBC to broadcast a live statement on television addressing the issue.
Ofcom emphasized that the BBC's lack of transparency in this case had the "potential to erode the significantly high levels of trust" that audiences place in the BBC as a public service broadcaster.

Read more news on